Prediction of Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Ryan Sweeting Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
D. Gimeno-Traver vs R. Sweeting

Daniel Gimeno-Traver

ESP

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

6'5" (196 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$1.1M

Career Money

$476.6K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Ryan Sweeting

USA

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

6'5" (196 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$1.1M

Career Money

$476.6K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Gimeno-Traver 0 - 1 Sweeting

They have played 3 sets in total, with Daniel Gimeno-Traver winning 0 and Ryan Sweeting winning 3. The last match between Ryan Sweeting and Daniel Gimeno-Traver was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 18-01-2011, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Ryan Sweeting getting the victory 6-4 6-4 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Gimeno-Traver	0
Sweeting	1

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Australian Open - Melbourne(01-18-11)

Stats

Ryan Sweeting

Daniel Gimeno-Traver

D. Gimeno-Traver vs R. Sweeting H2H Profile

D. Gimeno-Traver	Stats	R. Sweeting
$1,102,200	Career Prize Money	$476,645
56.61% (625-479)	Career Total W/L	56.72% (249-190)
0	Hard	1
24	Titles	5
0	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

D. Gimeno-Traver vs R. Sweeting Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Daniel Gimeno-Traver has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Ryan Sweeting has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Daniel Gimeno-Traver, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ryan Sweeting has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Daniel Gimeno-Traver has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ryan Sweeting has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Daniel Gimeno-Traver has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Ryan Sweeting winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Daniel Gimeno-Traver has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 578/369), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 21% (W/L 6/22). Ryan Sweeting has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 51/26), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 41% (W/L 12/17).
Player level: In the last year, Daniel Gimeno-Traver has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Ryan Sweeting has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Daniel Gimeno-Traver winning 0 times and Ryan Sweeting being victorious 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Daniel Gimeno-Traver winning 0 and Ryan Sweeting winning 3.
The last match between Daniel Gimeno-Traver and Ryan Sweeting was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 18-01-2011, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Ryan Sweeting getting the victory 6-4 6-4 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:51:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Daniel Gimeno-Traver has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Ryan Sweeting has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Daniel Gimeno-Traver has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ryan Sweeting has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Daniel Gimeno-Traver has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ryan Sweeting has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Ryan Sweeting Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

D. Gimeno-Traver vs R. Sweeting H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

D. Gimeno-Traver	Stats	R. Sweeting
0	H2H Matches Won	1
0	Sets Won	3
9	Games Won	18
10	Aces (Total)	3
2	Total Double Faults	6
1:51:0	Average Match Time	1:51:0
61% (47/77)	1st Serve %	74% (84/113)
66% (31/47)	1st Serve Win %	70% (59/84)
40% (12/30)	2nd Serve Win %	41% (12/29)
8% (1/12)	Break Pts Won %	86% (6/7)
35% (42/119)	Return Points Win %	43% (34/79)
0% (0/1)	Best‑of‑5 Win %	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

D. Gimeno-Traver Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Barcelona Challenger - 04-10-2021
Q1 Oleksii KrutykhO. Krutykh	L	6-2 6-0	Stats
Oeiras 3 Challenger - 17-05-2021
Q1 Ernests GulbisE. Gulbis	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Barcelona Challenger - 30-09-2019
R1 Javier Barranco CosanoJ. Barranco	L	6-3 6-0	Stats
Florence Challenger - 23-09-2019
R1 Mario Vilella MartinezM. Vilella	L	7-6(1) 6-2	Stats
Biella Challenger - 16-09-2019
R1 Viktor GalovicV. Galovic	L	6-3 7-5	Stats

View All

R. Sweeting Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Lexington Challenger - 27-07-2015
R2 Mitchell KruegerM. Krueger	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
R1 Carsten BallC. Ball	W	7-6(3) 6-2	Stats
Binghamton Challenger - 20-07-2015
R1 Edward CorrieE. Corrie	L	7-5 6-2	Stats
Sarasota Challenger - 13-04-2015
Q1 Gregory OuelletteG. Ouellette	L	4-6 6-4 6-3	Stats
US Men's Clay Court Championship - Houston - 06-04-2015
Q2 Hyeon ChungH. Chung	L	6-1 6-1	Stats

View All

D. Gimeno-Traver vs R. Sweeting Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

D. Gimeno-Traver	Stats	R. Sweeting
56.61% (625/479)	YTD Win/Loss	56.72% (249/190)
54.44% (1415/1184)	Sets Win/Loss	55.16% (567/461)
51.91% (12975/12022)	Games Win/Loss	51.93% (5033/4658)
34.12% (29/56)	Hard Win/Loss	55.25% (142/115)
61.03% (578/369)	Clay Win/Loss	66.23% (51/26)
27.27% (12/32)	Indoor Hard W/L	57.89% (44/32)
21.43% (6/22)	Grass Win/Loss	41.38% (12/17)
0.22	Aces Per Game	0.19
2684	Aces Total	908
0.18	Double Faults Per Game	0.2
2209	Total Double Faults	937
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
600.16	Average Opponent Rank	62.95
59% (29576/49868)	1st Serve %	64% (10470/16355)
70% (20559/29576)	1st Serve Win %	68% (7144/10470)
50% (10099/20308)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (2866/5895)
42% (2075/4983)	Break Points Won % (Total)	42% (675/1606)
39% (19916/50722)	Return Points Win %	39% (6466/16485)
29.82% (17/40)	Slam W/L	53.19% (25/22)
46.27% (31/36)	Masters W/L	48.39% (15/16)
33.33% (2/4)	Cups W/L	0.00% (0/1)
46.82% (140/159)	Main Tour W/L	56.25% (72/56)
61.03% (343/219)	Challenger W/L	58.45% (121/86)
81.42% (92/21)	Futures W/L	64.00% (16/9)
58% (605/1050)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	58% (241/413)
28% (11/40)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	23% (5/22)
47% (175/372)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	56% (76/135)
55% (196/355)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (65/121)
87% (597/521)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (254/217)
12% (597/73)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (254/36)
20% (505/100)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	17% (185/31)